|
Synopses





Tables of Contents




Documents






Background




Prof. Denton L.
Watson




|
Synopsis
Volume IV: 1955-1960
The liberating
impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of
Education sparked open rebellion marked by violence, highlighted
by the murder of fourteen-year-old Emmett Till in Mississippi in
1955, and fierce economic pressure on local blacks for seeking both
social integration and the right to vote. President Eisenhower did
not help by calling the Brown decision “illegal.” He thus
correctly acknowledged that “we are probably going to be busy” on
“that question for a while.” In the Congress, 101 Dixiecrats in the
House and Senate in March 1956 launched a unified opposition to the
decision under the rubric of their “Southern Manifesto,” while the
middleclass in the South solidified the rebellion against the
Constitution behind a front of “massive resistance,” by creating the
White Citizens’ Council, which was generally regarded as manicured
Kluxism, and by fiercely expanding their states’ rights rebellion
through the provocative practices of “interposition” and
“nullification.” Resolutely, nevertheless, Mitchell confidently
intensified in Congress the NAACP’s struggle for a permanent FEPC,
nondiscrimination protections in federal aid to school construction,
in military reserve training and housing bills, for omnibus civil
rights legislation, and for other protections through executive
action.
In 1955 Eisenhower
took another significant step in continuing the FEPC idea by issuing
Executive Order 10590, which created the President’s Committee on
Government Employment to replace Truman’s Fair Employment Board. The
center piece of the nondiscrimination proposals for federal spending
programs was the litmus test Powell Amendments, which were prepared
by Mitchell and offered in the House by Rep. Adam Clayton Powell,
Jr., of Harlem.
That year Mitchell
also achieved another major objective when, at his urging, Charles
Thomas, secretary of the Navy, issued an order prohibiting racial
segregation and discrimination in all shore establishments and yard
facilities. His order ended segregation in all Navy facilities in
the South.
The turning point in the NAACP’s
long struggle for civil rights legislation came in 1956 when
Attorney General Herbert Brownell, at Mitchell’s behest adopted
recommendations of the report of Truman’s Committee on Civil Rights,
To Secure These Rights, and proposed measures to Congress to
(Part II) broaden the functions of the Civil Rights Section of the
Justice Department beyond its original 1939 scope, and to (Part III)
provide protections for individuals’ Fourteenth Amendment rights
from violations by other private citizens. The civil rights package
Brownell proposed to Congress also included Part I, a provision to
create a Civil Rights Commission; and Part IV, a provision giving the attorney
general authority to seek injunctions in court to protect Fifteenth
Amendment voting rights. Also marking 1956 as a bellwether year for
civil rights was the re-election of Lyndon Baines Johnson and his
elevation in Senate as majority leader. Although Mitchell and
Johnson differed fundamentally on civil rights, they respected each
other’s political acumen.
Mitchell’s strategy
was characterized by his creation of bipartisan coalitions that were
composed of such lawmakers in the Senate as William Knowland, the
notable conservative minority leader from California, and liberal
Democratic standard-bearer Paul Douglas of Illinois; and, in the
House of Emanuel Celler, a liberal New York Democrat, and William
McCulloch of Ohio, another conservative Republican. The result of
this delicate balance and brutish maneuvering was passage of the
1957 Civil Rights Act, the first such measure since Reconstruction.
Though the compromises that the wily Johnson engineered gutted Part
III and other key features of the first such measure in 82 years,
Mitchell welcomed it as a great step forward in a struggle he had
taken to a new plateau. The act was primarily a voting rights
measure, but it provided for the establishment of the United States
Civil Rights Commission, which Mitchell ensured reinforced the NAACP
policies, and elevated the Civil Rights Section of the Justice
Department to a much-strengthened Civil Rights Division.
That year Vice
President Richard M. Nixon provided crucial help when, as presiding
officer of the Senate, he made a key ruling that enabled the civil
rights forces to by-pass the Judiciary Committee, whose chairman was
James O. Eastland of Mississippi, and send the administration’s bill
directly to the floor for debate. Had the bill been sent to Eastland’s
committee he would have killed it. The result was that, even though Dixiecrat standard-bearer Strom Thurmond of South Carolina later
broke the no-filibuster agreement Johnson had engineered among the
southerners, the Senate on August 29 brought to reality Mitchell’s
dream. He said: “At last the Congress has assumed some of its
responsibility in the field of civil rights. I predict that the
constructive results and continued effort by all of us will
encourage the nation’s law making body to carry on the good work
until the full job is done.” He declared that “law, logic, morality
and all other American concepts of decency” were “on our side” and
would help African Americans win their historic struggle for
equality.
In an attempt to
get Congress to continue what he called this “good work,” Mitchell
launched a struggle to strengthen the 1957 Act that led to passage
of the 1960 Civil Rights Act. Its main provisions were: (1) criminal
penalties for impeding or interfering with the exercise of rights or
the performance of duties under a federal court decree; (2) criminal
penalties for certain acts in connection with the burning or bombing
of homes, schools, places of worship and other buildings; (3) a
requirement that election records be preserved for federal use and
inspection in connection with voting discrimination complaints; (4)
authorization of education for children of military personnel in
areas where schools were closed because of state action; and (5) the
creation of a voter referee plan recommended by the U.S. Department
of Justice to aid in registration and voting in areas where there
was a pattern or practice of racial discrimination. The 1960 Act,
however, was merely a weak amendment to the 1957 Act, thus it
presaged the subsequent epic struggles in Congress.
|
|