|
Synopses





Tables of Contents




Documents






Background




Prof. Denton L.
Watson




|
Synopsis
Volume V: 1960-1978
The decade began as a paradox of expectations and brutal realities.
Until 1960, the NAACP was the modern civil rights movement. Its role
as leader was emphasized by the virulent hatred and attacks from
diehard segregationists that, following the
Brown v. Board of Education
landmark victory, forced it to suspend operations in Alabama, Texas,
Tennessee, and Virginia, and to be especially wary of similar
threats in Florida, North Carolina, and Georgia. The seismic impact
of sit-ins by four black college students at the all-white Woolworth
lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina, on February 1, 1960,
did not register visibly on the Congress, Clarence Mitchell, Jr.’s
battleground. Nevertheless, the demonstrations signaled dramatically
the opening of a new, explosive front in the civil rights movement
in the South, which placed immense pressure on Mitchell for the
passage of more comprehensive civil rights laws.
At the
same time, the electrifying election of John F. Kennedy as the 35th
president of the United States heralded hope of a racially
liberating frontier that transcended politics. Nowhere, however, was
this paradox of hope and reality better demonstrated than in the
Congress. There, outside the national glare, the southerners and
their northern allies continued unfazed their opposition to
implementation of the NAACP’s legislative agenda, thus further
inciting racial explosions.
Kennedy’s
promise to end discrimination in housing “with the stroke of a pen”
considerably intensified demands for strong presidential leadership,
which was not forthcoming. This reticence ignited fierce
confrontations in Washington between Mitchell and the administration
and, in the South, between younger blacks and white segregationists
that drew international attention to America’s racial dilemma. The
resulting assassination of Medgar Evers, the NAACP’s field secretary
in Mississippi, on June 12, 1963, consequently forced Kennedy to
submit to Congress a much stronger civil rights bill than he had
done earlier. With the burden of action now placed firmly in the lap
of Congress, the NAACP and its allies in the Leadership Conference
on Civil Rights mobilized unprecedented political support to win
passage of the Kennedy bill.
That
mobilization included the
NAACP Legislative Strategy Conference in
Washington on August 6 to 8 and the 1963
March on Washington the end of that August, both of which
were organized by the
NAACP.
The
assassination of President Kennedy brought the climate of
unprecedented expectations to a crucial peak and transferred the
leadership of the Executive Branch to Vice President Lyndon Baines
Johnson, a southerner from Texas. Together with Mitchell, Johnson
used his intimate knowledge of Congress to guide the omnibus civil
rights bill to passage in 1964. Among other things, the 1964 Act
barred segregation in public accommodations (Title II), the goal of
the demonstrators in the South, and discrimination in federal
spending (Title VI) and employment (Title VII), both NAACP goals
since 1941.
The
incremental nature of the struggle was promptly reinforced in 1965
with demands for stronger protections for voting rights in the
South. Responding to President Johnson’s call for Congress to enact
comprehensive protections for voting rights, Mitchell utilized his
long experience and once more led this struggle, which resulted in
passage of the bill on August 6. Its key provisions suspended the
use of the infamous literacy tests or similar voter qualification
devices in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina,
Virginia, and thirty-nine counties of North Carolina and authorized
the appointment of federal voting examiners (or registrars) in those
areas. It required that all laws affecting voting passed by those
states or counties be approved by the U.S. attorney general or the
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia before they could
become effective.
The
following year, oblivious to the strong national tide rising against
more civil rights legislation, Mitchell was the only leader who
supported Johnson’s call for passage of a bill to bar discrimination
in the sale or rental of housing. In his civil rights message on
April 28, 1966, Johnson asked Congress to pass, in addition to the
housing legislation, measures to protect blacks and civil rights
workers with more effective criminal statutes (the Worker Protection
provision), to prohibit racial discrimination in the selection of
federal juries and empower the attorney general to sue to end
similar bias in state courts; and to broaden the attorney general’s
authority to sue to end discrimination in public schools.
On April 11, 1968, after Congress finally passed what
was now the Fair Housing Act, President Johnson signed it into law
noting that, once more, “the voice of justice speaks.” (The Jury
Selection and Service Act of 1968 was passed separately.)
Acknowledging Mitchell’s role,
The Washington Post
said he deserved a “special salute” for “the part he played in
bringing the latest civil rights bill to enactment – and for the
part he played in the adoption of every civil rights measure for
more than a decade past.” His faith in the Congress and the American
people, the Post
said, “steadfastly thwarted and denied failure” in the long struggle
for such legislation. “All Americans are in debt to him.”
Following passage of the laws, Mitchell devoted
considerable effort to enforcing and to strengthening them.
|
|